Search & Seizure: Police Stand-Offs with Daniel McNerney, Superior Court Judge, Orange County, CA Even during a police standoff with a suspect, police are not relieved of their obligation to seek a warrant if the opportunity presents itself. Case cited: Fisher v. San Jose (2007) DJDAR 17215. (8:37)
Spotlight Plus Rush Equals Detention with Jeff Rubin, Deputy District Attorney, Alameda County, CA Even if an officer does not actually command a suspect to do anything, if an officer illuminates the suspect with a police spotlight and then rushes directly at the suspect— asking about his parole or probation status and disregarding the suspect’s indication that he was merely standing outside his home— the officer will be deemed to have detained the suspect by his nonverbal behavior. Case cited: People v. Garry (2007) 156 Cal.App.4th 1100. (7:21)
Give Them All the Information with William W. Bedsworth, Appellate Court Justice, State of California Justice Bedsworth analyzes the recent Jernigan case to explain the obligations of the prosecutor, including the police, to provide the defense all important information. Case cited: United States v. Jernigan (2007 C.D.O.S. 8052). (5:39)
Crossing Limit Line Not Okay Per VC §22450 with Jeff Rubin, Deputy District Attorney, Alameda County, CA Vehicle Code section 22450 requires that a driver approaching a stop sign at the entrance to, or within, an intersection, must “stop at a limit line,” if there is a marked limit line. The statute mandates a full stop before any part of the vehicle crosses the limit line. Case/statute cited: People v.Binkowski (2007) 68 Cal.Rptr.3d 741; Veh. Code § 22450. (3:48)
Miranda: Statements To Jail Psychiatrist with Daniel McNerney, Superior Court Judge, Orange County, CA This segment discusses the circumstances under which a defendant’s statements to a jail psychologist may or may not be admissible at trial. Cases cited: Beaty v. Schriro (2007) DAR 17487; U.S. v. D.F. (1995) 63 F3d 671. (8:09)
Kicking In Door Can Be Burglary with Jeff Rubin, Deputy District Attorney, Alameda County, CA So long as a suspect has the intent to commit a felony or a theft, kicking in the door to a building can be sufficient “entry” for purposes of establishing a completed burglary even if no portion of the suspect’s body actually breaks the plane of the building. Case/statute cited: People v. Calderon 2007 WL 4418111; Pen. Code § 459. (5:17)
Date Produced: February 2008
|