Search Warrants: Excessive Force in Executing with William Bedsworth, Justice of the Court of Appeal, State of California One of the least-discussed aspects of serving a search warrant is the use of excessive force and the unnecessary destruction of property. An otherwise perfectly valid warrant can be thrown out if a court determines excessive force was used or property was unnecessarily destroyed. Justice Bedsworth uses the Ankeny case as model for analyzing the propriety of police action. Case cited: United States v. Ankeny (2007) Daily Journal DAR 8998 (6/20/07). (9:03)
Use of Ruse to Seize Vehicle with Jeff Rubin, Alameda County District Attorney's Office Police may engage in some use of stealth and deceit in seizing property so long as such use is reasonable, i.e., when the government’s justification for engaging in the ruse outweighs the intrusion on the suspect’s interests. Discusses a case upholding an elaborate ruse to seize a car where the police had the right to seize the property but needed to prevent the delivery of drugs while simultaneously concealing an ongoing investigation. Case cited: United States v. Alverez-Tejada (9th Cir. 2007) 2007 WL 1651268. (9:47)
Search & Seizure: Abandoned Property with Daniel McNerney, Superior Court Judge, State of California The mere fact that a person uses a false name and/or address is not sufficient to establish abandonment of property. Case cited: People v. Pereira (2007) 150 CA4 1106. (8:25)
License Check Is Not a Search with Jeff Rubin, Alameda County District Attorney's Office A license plate check does not constitute a Fourth Amendment search. Therefore, an officer does not need any reasonable suspicion to run a license plate check. Case cited: United States v. Diaz-Castaneda 2007 WL 2044244. (5:46)
Traffic Stops: Ordering Out and Inventory with William Bedsworth, Justice of the Court of Appeal, State of California In Hoyos, police stopped a car for a broken license plate light. When neither the driver nor his passenger had a license, they knew they had to impound the car and began to inventory it. When they found a 9mm magazine with 12 rounds in it-- and a loaded 9mm pistol in the car-- they intensified their search and found 28 lbs. of marijuana in the trunk. Long story short: Their broken light violation turned up the murderers of a local drug dealer and his wife. Justice Bedsworth discusses the search and seizure aspects of the case. Case cited: People v. Hoyos (2007) Daily Journal DAR 11132 (7/24/07). (5:45)
Temporary Delay of Packages in Transit with Jeff Rubin, Alameda County District Attorney's Office No seizure implicating the Fourth Amendment occurs if a package in transit is detained in a manner that does not significantly interfere with its timely delivery in the normal course of business. Thus, a 10-minute delay of a FedEx package en route, during which a drug-sniffing dog alerted to its contents, did not need to be justified by reasonable suspicion. Case cited: United States v. Hoang (9th Cir. 2007) 486 F.3d 1156. (7:14)
Date Produced: September 2007
|